[HOT] Are there any detailed reports or research on the utilization of HOT maps on the ground?

Andrew Buck andrew.r.buck at gmail.com
Sat Nov 1 13:16:14 UTC 2014


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

There is also this report from CartONG:

http://cartong.org/news/msf-case-study-gis-support-epidemic-operations

That page is just a short summary, there is a link to the full PDF on
the bottom of the page.

- -AndrewBuck


On 10/31/2014 08:25 PM, Kate Chapman wrote:
> Hi Gideon,
> 
> Certainly it helps to have examples. There are a couple reports
> that might be of interest from the World Bank and the 2nd one is
> the World Bank and University College London.
> 
> Open Data for Resilience Initiative: Field Guide: 
> https://www.gfdrr.org/ODRIFG Crowdsourcing Geographic Information
> Use in Government: http://crowdgov.wordpress.com/report/
> 
> Best,
> 
> -Kate
> 
> 
> On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 7:39 PM, Blake Girardot
> <bgirardot at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I am not really sure what you are saying when you say: "Is there
>> more than "The maps helped a lot!""
>> 
>> I think feedback like that from the groups that use the data we
>> generate are very convincing that the mapping we do helps on the
>> ground. Further, for me it is very informative that these same
>> humanitarian groups do ask the HOT specifically to do mapping for
>> them. I do not think they would ask us if they did not feel it
>> helped them.
>> 
>> Also, there is a somewhat different scope of the HOT mapping that
>> is about empowering local communities outside of immediate
>> crises.
>> 
>> Best wishes, Blake
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 10/31/2014 1:25 PM, Gideon Hartmann wrote:
>> 
>>> Hey mappers,
>>> 
>>> whenever I tell friends about the HOT projects, I get a lot of
>>> sceptic responses. Most people don't see the importance of our
>>> maps and there are even voices saying it is much more something
>>> to keep mappers occupied than actual help. If I go deeper into
>>> online research on the impact of HOT, I can find some opinions
>>> here and there, but these are mostly very vague and based on
>>> few people's opinions. Is there more than "The maps helped a
>>> lot!" or "The maps could help in case xxx..." anywhere? Are
>>> there any quantitative data sets or any scientifically
>>> executed interviews?
>>> 
>>> Keep mapping!
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________ HOT mailing
>>> list HOT at openstreetmap.org 
>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
>>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________ HOT mailing list 
>> HOT at openstreetmap.org 
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________ HOT mailing list 
> HOT at openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
> 

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=0JJT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the HOT mailing list