[HOT] bother adding source=Whatever to each object?
sanderd17 at gmail.com
Mon Nov 3 18:51:52 UTC 2014
It's more logical to put it on the changeset.
Like when you draw a building, and add source=bing. But then someone who
lives there gives it a name, and forgets to alter the source, the object
has data that can't be derived from the source. So it's in fact your edit
operation that has a source, not the object itself.
As such, source=Bing is by many mappers preferred on the changeset (also
because it keeps the database a bit smaller).
When you edit with JOSM, you can add the source manually as a tag to the
changeset (which is handy if your source is a survey or offline source). In
iD, it automatically logs the imagery used in the changeset, but you don't
get an option to give other sources (which is why many people still put a
source on the objects).
2014-11-03 19:41 GMT+01:00 Ray Kiddy <ray at ganymede.org>:
> Hello -
> This is probably a somewhat basic question about editing for HOT tasks.
> As I have been editing in various HOT tasks, I have been adding
> something like source=Bing (where that is the imagery) onto every
> road, every building, every ... everything that I create. Need I bother
> with this?
> I have seen in (perhaps just some tasks') instructions that I could also
> just put this on the changeset comment. So I can just add it to the
> changeset once instead of adding it to the object 100 times?
> If it could be put on the changeset comment and not on every object,
> that would be convenient. It would also explain why, when I look at all
> of the objects others have created, I hardly ever see a source value.
> So, am I doing too much work by re-entering the source value every
> time? What is the level of diligence expected here?
> thanx - ray
> HOT mailing list
> HOT at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the HOT