[HOT] JOSM people validating / mapping in Nepal, please run JOSM's validator before finishing a tile
davecorley at gmail.com
Thu May 7 12:10:25 UTC 2015
Just to clarify, josm & id both now validate but it's possible newbies
don't know how to handle the returned errors and just ignore them.
The untagged link in my original email was given as a sample only. There
are also many, many issues with routing, boundaries, waterways, etc etc
Granted there may be some false positives, but those would be the
On 7 May 2015 12:27, "Florian Lohoff" <f at zz.de> wrote:
> On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 12:57:06AM -0700, Springfield Harrison wrote:
> > Hello Dave,
> > This is amazing to see the vast number of invalid tags. This
> > calls into question the integrity of the database. Do you have much luck
> > getting people to run the validator?
> In OSM there is no such thing as an invalid tag. Everybody is allowed to
> invent new tags although your expectation should not be that there is a
> single data consumer who will make use of it.
> The common set of tags has been selected by a "do-ocracy" - You see
> data consumers making use of a certain tag and you start tagging to
> influence these data consumers.
> > I am baffled that the data validation does not take place right
> at the
> > data entry stage. This is very common in database applications. All the
> > critical fields have validation rules so that the operator can neither
> skip the
> > critical fields nor enter data that is not applicable to that field. If
> > complex as it is, is lacking input data validation, that is a serious
> > in my opinion. For this type of mission, complete and accurate data is
> > critical. You do not have the luxury of time hoping that people will
> > with a post entry validation process.
> Both ways are perfectly valid - validating on input or on data
> OSM has gone the way of validating or using data on the consumer side
> which i am very happy about. I have invented a tag myself for hinting a
> routing instance for infrastructure e.g. Telecoms cables. If there would
> have been an input validation i could not have done so.
> Florian Lohoff f at zz.de
> We need to self-defense - GnuPG/PGP enable your email today!
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the HOT