[HOT] Mapping buildings something to think about

Jo winfixit at gmail.com
Tue Apr 11 09:32:42 UTC 2017

Maybe we're explaining it to them wrong, somehow.

It's more likely that it's too easy to do it wrong though. These issues
keep coming back and haunt us.

Anyway, I went in and tried it myself, once more.

'3' (to draw an area, I like keyboard shortcuts)
4 mouse clicks + enter or 5 mouse clicks, depending if you close the shape
or not.

Pressing 's' along the way here has different outcomes. That's not the way
to go.

Pressing enter gives back the dialog to turn it into a building (if you had
mapped a building before). That's good.
Only now, the mapper should press 's' before moving on.

Knowing myself, I would also forget about that.

In JOSM I press 'b', then 3 mouse clicks and I have a building. Tagged and
squared the way it should be.

If it's  L-shaped, I press 'x', double click on a side and extrude a part
of it.

If I somehow got it wrong, I press 'w', move the nodes to the corners, then
press 'q'. That's also what I do/did to fix all those unsquared buildings
when validating tasks.


2017-04-11 7:46 GMT+02:00 Shawn K. Quinn <skquinn at rushpost.com>:

> On 04/11/2017 12:23 AM, Dale Kunce wrote:
> > All this is a reminder to everyone to keep the language and intent of
> > statements in a respectful manner. The iD developers and mainteners work
> > very hard to manage the project and do a very good job. I know some of
> > you have frustrations but please be respectful of others time and
> > efforts as well.
> I have a saying (from the would-be radio/TV producer in me): Sometimes
> bleep happens, and sometimes it happens and there's no bleep.
> I can understand the frustration from having to clean up "iD droppings"
> (for lack of a better term). I have lost count of the number of slopped
> down building outlines that aren't even close to the rectangular truth
> on the ground (this is normal OSM i.e. non-HOT mapping). I've managed to
> keep my changeset comments profanity-free despite my frustration, which
> at times has been a challenge. That said it's hard for me to blame the
> original poster for using that word in that context, I probably would
> have said it the same way.
> Admittedly some of the blame has to fall on the users for not knowing
> how to use iD properly. It is possible to tag buildings correctly and
> square them up to 90° angles with iD. I've done it before.
> --
> Shawn K. Quinn <skquinn at rushpost.com>
> http://www.rantroulette.com
> http://www.skqrecordquest.com
> _______________________________________________
> HOT mailing list
> HOT at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/hot/attachments/20170411/a183ca03/attachment.html>

More information about the HOT mailing list