[Imports] Hungarian CLC import

[Paul Norman]

OSM attribution is done through listing on
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contributors not through source tags
which can be (and frequently are) removed.

 

I remain skeptical of the value of CLC:code in cases where the CLC:code maps
to only one combination of OSM tags. The code can be inferred from the tags
that were used on import, so there is no additional information.

 

From: uzemelteto at gmail.com [mailto:uzemelteto at gmail.com] On Behalf Of Balázs
Szalkai
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2012 5:12 AM
To: Paul Norman; imports at openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Imports] Hungarian CLC import

 

Hi,

 

The exact attribution text (© EEA, Koppenhága (2009); Készítette a FÖMI a
KvVM megbízásából (2009)) is specified by the organizations who made the
dataset. See
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2011-April/057501.html This
source tag identifies all data that comes from the Hungarian CLC dataset.

 

I didn't find any specific description for CLC:id and CLC:code on the wiki,
though several national CLC pages list them. As far as I know, CLC:id is a
unique id assigned to the polygons, while CLC:code does indicate the landuse
type. CLC:code is a three-digit number with all digits ranging from 1 to 5.
For a legend see
http://eusoils.jrc.ec.europa.eu/library/data/efsa/Images/Legend_Corine.pdf

 

I think this key should be kept because its values do not correspond exactly
to OSM landuse= or natural= tags, so it does mean extra information.

 

On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 8:36 PM, Paul Norman <penorman at mac.com> wrote:

Is it possible to use a source key that makes it clear that it’s CLC?

 

Are the values for CLC:code and CLC:id listed on the wiki?

 

If CLC:code indicates the landuse type, is there any value to it if it is
duplicating the tagging?

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/attachments/20121105/2953c679/attachment.html>