[Imports] [Imports-us] Completion of King County Address Import

Jason Remillard remillard.jason at gmail.com
Mon Jan 13 01:27:17 UTC 2014


I can't recall an address import going forward over the last 1.5 years
that had building outlines and intentionally ignored them. You don't
have building outlines, so really nothing to argue about.


On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 6:09 PM, Johan C <osmned at gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm aware that there are several people on this list very much in favour of
> merging address nodes to building outlines. There has been a long discussion
> in October '...to merge or not to merge' on this list. I can't distill any
> other conclusion from that discussion other than that there was no consensus
> on merging or not merging. And maybe that's logical, because it's not a
> black and white discussion.
> Cheers, Johan
> 2014/1/12 Serge Wroclawski <emacsen at gmail.com>
>> Please do not cross post.
>> On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 5:19 PM, Johan C <osmned at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> But if you have the buildings, I think the consensus has been to merge
>> >> them in.
>> >
>> > Not quite. Consensus has been that there are two options, and that local
>> > communities (not individuals) can decide on the preferred option
>> Actually, the Import Guidelines require that any import go through
>> consensus on the imports list, and we generally do want to keep things
>> consistent. I think there are arguments on both sides of this issue to
>> be heard, but in this case, community refers to the OSM community as a
>> whole.
>> - Serge
> _______________________________________________
> Imports mailing list
> Imports at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports

More information about the Imports mailing list