[Imports] Handling of existing buildings in NYC import (was Re: Buildings & Address in Washington, DC, USA.)

Alex Barth alex at mapbox.com
Fri Jun 6 01:02:21 UTC 2014


Katie -

Can you show me an example?

We took great care to:

- Preserve existing buildings where they had higher quality than import
buildings
- Merge POIs were appropriate
- Don't touch POIs at all when situation unclear

On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 10:52 AM, Katie Filbert <filbertk at gmail.com> wrote:

> It looks like for NYC imports, they simply deleted existing buildings and
> added the new ones.  This includes areas that I surveyed on the ground,
> ensuring POIs lined up with the buildings correctly, updating for
> demolished / new buildings etc.
>
> To be honest, that is quite discouraging and demotivating to continue
> contributing to OSM.  The same thing ought not happen for DC, if we don't
> want to alienate the community.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/attachments/20140605/1fe328a4/attachment.html>


More information about the Imports mailing list