[Imports] Japan, KSJ2 municipality administrative boundary re-import
nyampire at gmail.com
Mon May 12 11:39:30 UTC 2014
I've read recent discussion on the thread "Vermont Town boundaries from
VCGI" & understood that points.
So I do not have intention to add "place" tag to Way or Relation objects.
I think "place" tag is to be used to Node (as relation's "admin_centre"
And my current proposal is in accordance with the admin_level scheme table
as you suggested.
The structure written in table is the fruit of our local consensus.
So I also think it is mandatory to get agreement on local ML if tagging
(county and/or state) might be changed.
2014-05-12 18:20 GMT+09:00 Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com>:
> 2014-05-12 2:44 GMT+02:00 Satoshi IIDA <nyampire at gmail.com>:
> There are some arguments to change "Prefecture" system to "State" system
>> in Japan politics.
>> (yes, it would take long years indeed...)
>> If this change would be applied even as partially, we could not keep a
>> way to represent the new systems.
>> So I'm reserving "admin_level=3" bit to represent "state" level.
>> In fact, "都道府県" level (like Tokyo, Chiba or so) is so called "prefecture"
>> in Japan.
>> And I think this is a similar structure to "province".
>> What is your opinion?
> I think it is not needed to put any place tags if you just want to tag
> administrative divisions. You simply add boundary=administrative,
> admin_level=*, name=* wikipedia, population etc. to the elements. There is
> a table for the corresponding legal entities here:
> If it is not sufficiently representing your reality, discuss it on the
> local ML and update the suggested values for Japan.
mail: nyampire at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Imports