[Imports] Miami-Dade County building import

Levente Juhász jlevente89 at gmail.com
Wed Jul 27 22:39:21 UTC 2016


Yeah, actually we use the textual MAILING_MUNIC field - when it's set. Will
implement a lookup from MUNIC for all the remaining addresses then so that
addr:city is always set.

We ignored ZIP +4.

On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 5:26 PM Brian May <bmay at mapwise.com> wrote:

> On 7/27/2016 2:22 PM, Levente Juhász wrote:
>
> Hi Clifford,
>
> Thanks for your effort on checking the data! Comments inline.
>
> Picking just one of the sample file I noticed that the street address is
>> abbreviated and no tag addr:city.
>>
>> NE 18th Avenue should be Northeast 18th Avenue
>>
>
> According to the Wiki, addr:city is not needed in general "if there are
> valid border polygons" - which is the case in Miami-Dade. These entries
> were not populated because "city" is missing from the county's address
> dataset, though.
>
>
> Hi Levente,
>
> City is present in the county data - check the MAILING_MUNIC field. Its in
> numeric form in the MUNIC field as well (requires code lookup). The data
> also has the FOLIO field which can be joined to the parcel data to get site
> city from there for some records that are missing the city name.
>
> Zip +4 is in the county data, too. Not sure if that is used.
>
>
> Brian
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/attachments/20160727/22d156da/attachment.html>


More information about the Imports mailing list