[Imports] Import of churches in Norway
Rafael Avila Coya
ravilacoya at gmail.com
Mon Jan 29 02:17:07 UTC 2018
Thank you for your answer. Now it's clear to me.
On 29/01/18 00:23, Andreas Vilén wrote:
> The building tag is used to show what kind of building it is, not its
> usage. ”A building that was built as a church” and so on in the
> descriptions of the values.
> This does not contradict your point as that speaks about usage.
> For instance this is now a museum, but clearly for many years was used
> as a church: https://sv.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sankt_Ibbs_nya_kyrka
> Skickat från min iPhone
> 28 jan. 2018 kl. 21:21 skrev Rafael Avila Coya <ravilacoya at gmail.com
> <mailto:ravilacoya at gmail.com>>:
>> Hi, Andreas:
>> I can't find what you say about buildings in the key:building wiki.
>> In any case, the life cycle wiki contradicts that:
>> The date namespace can be added to any tag to indicate a period of
>> validity for the tag.
>> key:date-date = value
>> key:date--date = value
>> key:date- = value
>> key:-date = value
>> It says to any tag.
>> Which one should we follow then?
>> On 28/01/18 08:59, Andreas Vilén wrote:
>>> ”If a church was a church and is not a church anymore (it is a
>>> community centre, for example), it can't be building=church. Let's
>>> say the church was constructed in 1780 and ended as church in 1978,
>>> and now is a community centre. In that case it should be
>>> "building:1780-1978"="church", "amenity:1780-1978"="place_of_worship"”
>>> No, the wiki clearly states that the building tag is used for what
>>> the building was built as. A building built as a church will always
>>> be building=church no matter the usage.
>>> Skickat från min iPhone
>>> 28 jan. 2018 kl. 03:30 skrev Rafael Avila Coya <ravilacoya at gmail.com
>>> <mailto:ravilacoya at gmail.com> <mailto:ravilacoya at gmail.com>>:
More information about the Imports