[josm-dev] JOSM && Changesets?
andrzej zaborowski
balrogg at gmail.com
Tue Dec 29 02:42:39 GMT 2009
2009/12/29 Russ Nelson <nelson at crynwr.com>:
> Is JOSM's Changeset support not quite right?
>
> I'm thinking that the way it should work instead is NOT close
> Changesets ever. Instead, it should keep (all) the changeset(s) open,
> and if you make another edit which is within the bounding box of an
> open changeset, it should default to adding it to that changeset.
My opinion is probably skewed by using source code repositories but
imho changes should not be grouped by bboxes, instead they should be
grouped logically under the changeset whose comment best fits the type
of change out of those you have open. Grouping by location carries
very little information, is an easy task that could be done
automatically and is only slightly better than having no changesets at
all.
Cheers
More information about the josm-dev
mailing list