[OSM-legal-talk] Is the "data share-alike" road navigable?

[SteveC]

rigghhtt... but wouldn't demanding the illustrator file conflict with 
what you want?

Positing that .osm would be acceptable, how would you go about getting 
from illustrator to .osm?

Richard Fairhurst wrote:
> SteveC wrote:
> 
>> So what do you define as source material? Presumably not the   
>> illustrator file?
> 
> Entirely our decision how we'd define this in the licence!
> 
> The GPL says "corresponding machine-readable source code". We could  
> perhaps say something like "any commonly accepted format for data  
> interchange", which for geodata might be shapefiles, .osm or even a  
> CSV of lats and longs.
> 
> As ever, it's up to the licensor (us) to set the terms and the  
> licensee (cartographer) to comply with them.
> 
> cheers
> Richard
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> legal-talk mailing list
> legal-talk at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/legal-talk
> 

-- 
have fun,

SteveC steve at asklater.com http://www.asklater.com/steve/