[OSM-legal-talk] License Cut-over and critical mass

John Smith deltafoxtrot256 at gmail.com
Mon Jul 19 11:13:02 BST 2010


On 19 July 2010 20:07, Rob Myers <rob at robmyers.org> wrote:
> My source for the fact that creativity is not being relied on is the fact
> that the ODbL doesn't rely on it and the ODbL is the currently proposed
> replacement licence.

It's my understanding that once someone breaches contract with OSM-F
(or whoever) and say pushes the data via ftp or p2p or ... and the
data is outside Europe where the database directive doesn't apply
isn't the only form of protection still copyright?




More information about the legal-talk mailing list