[OSM-legal-talk] License Cut-over and critical mass

[Emilie Laffray]

On 19 July 2010 11:13, John Smith <deltafoxtrot256 at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 19 July 2010 20:07, Rob Myers <rob at robmyers.org> wrote:
> > My source for the fact that creativity is not being relied on is the fact
> > that the ODbL doesn't rely on it and the ODbL is the currently proposed
> > replacement licence.
>
> It's my understanding that once someone breaches contract with OSM-F
> (or whoever) and say pushes the data via ftp or p2p or ... and the
> data is outside Europe where the database directive doesn't apply
> isn't the only form of protection still copyright?
>
>
Or contract law. It has been pointed out previously that all map providers
are using contract law to restrict their data not copyrights.

Emilie Laffray
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/attachments/20100719/744f3ba4/attachment.html>