[OSM-legal-talk] Using OSM data without modifying - are there any guidelines?
simon at poole.ch
Sat Jun 27 09:15:53 UTC 2015
Naturally, in a perfect world, you are correct.
Unluckily experience shows (both here and on help) that the responders
don't point to the guidelines and the other relevant material (at best
they refer to outdated pre-licence change wiki pages) they offer their
own, not clearly identified as such, opinions.
Now if the people asking the questions were aware of that and took the
answers with multiple grains of salt, you could say: ok, let the
armchair lawyers have their fun. Alas what happens is that it simply
provides perfect material for the FUD-mongers.
For the record, the OSMFs policies are enshrined in the following places:
Am 27.06.2015 um 10:23 schrieb Richard Fairhurst:
> Simon Poole wrote:
>> As the name of this list says it is "legal talk" (aka yapping
>> without consequence) ... not "get-help-from-the-OSMF".
> With my list admin hat on, I think that's a little harsh. Often, as you say,
> queries can be "resolved by pointing to the relevant published guidelines"
> and there's no reason why the community can't do this on this list - or on
> help.osm.org, or wherever - rather than burdening LWG with the task of
> fielding so many routine enquiries.
> legal-talk@ is not a bad first port of call. It is indeed only a -talk list
> but we don't necessarily need to bite people who come to talk.
> View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/OSM-legal-talk-Using-OSM-data-without-modifying-are-there-any-guidelines-tp5848948p5849030.html
> Sent from the Legal Talk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> legal-talk mailing list
> legal-talk at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the legal-talk