[Osmf-talk] New license proposal status II
um at ulfm.de
Thu Dec 3 08:08:52 UTC 2009
Frederik Ramm schrieb:
> The responsibility of the decision lies with the members. They need to
> be fully informed. If *I* were on the LWG, I would welcome opposition
> statements and include them in the letter I send to the members, because
> it is not *me* who makes the decision, and not me who has to take
> ultimate responsibility - it is the members. If I would keep crucial
> information away from them, that would only open the door to later
> claims of a doctored process.
I think in the interest of transparency the email should include link to
the archive of this discussion, or to a wiki page summarizing it.
More information about the osmf-talk