[Osmf-talk] New license proposal status II

80n 80n80n at gmail.com
Thu Dec 3 08:49:02 UTC 2009

On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 8:08 AM, Ulf Möller <um at ulfm.de> wrote:

> Frederik Ramm schrieb:
> > The responsibility of the decision lies with the members. They need to
> > be fully informed. If *I* were on the LWG, I would welcome opposition
> > statements and include them in the letter I send to the members, because
> > it is not *me* who makes the decision, and not me who has to take
> > ultimate responsibility - it is the members. If I would keep crucial
> > information away from them, that would only open the door to later
> > claims of a doctored process.
> I think in the interest of transparency the email should include link to
> the archive of this discussion, or to a wiki page summarizing it.
Could the LWG please consider provision of a link to a wiki page where those
who do not support the new license can put their case?

This is a formal request, copied to Mike Collinson, Chairman of the LWG.


> _______________________________________________
> osmf-talk mailing list
> osmf-talk at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osmf-talk
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/osmf-talk/attachments/20091203/adcc65e6/attachment.html>

More information about the osmf-talk mailing list