[Osmf-talk] OSMF and Evangelism
nick at blacksworld.net
Fri Jul 31 17:46:00 UTC 2009
Rafael - you have lots of good points. It would be great to get some
of these ideas channeled into an OSM-F working group that focussed on
supporting mapping in developing countries. I agree that the work we
saw at SOTM was inspirational. OSM can do a lot of good in a lot of
parts of the world and I firmly believe that its part of the OSM-F's
agenda to promote OSM to people who have not had the same
opportunities that most other OSMers have had.
On 30 Jul 2009, at 21:09, Rafael Morales wrote:
> I agree that the foundation cannot be expected to evangelize the
> entire world on the "goodness of OSM," to quote Nick, but I do feel
> strongly that the OSM Foundation should bring leadership and
> guidance to the project. As members of the OSM Foundation, we
> should then have an opportunity to weigh-in/vote on the Foundation's
> goals, and by consensus decide what if will focus on.
> I personally feel strongly that should include among its primary
> goals, actively promoting OSM in parts of the world were there is
> little map data (and I'm referring to the developing world). It is
> in those regions that access to quality maps could be most
> empowering; think Palestine mapping project and humanitarian crisis
> assistance. After all, it was Hurricane Katrina in 2005 that
> launched Google Earth into the day-to-day lexicon of the common
> American, and I would argue that OSM's work in those areas could do
> much more to promote the project, than mapping every single power
> line in Germany. (Sorry German OSM mappers, I give you incredible
> props for the completeness of your map, it is amazing, but I'm just
> making a point here).
> That said, this does not necessarily mean that the foundation has to
> devote huge amounts of resources to achieve this. There are
> certainly a lot of low-cost, high-impact projects it could support,
> such as setting up micro-grants to support mapping initiatives in
> the developing world; partnering with companies to provide hand-held
> GPS units (ex. Garmin) and laptops (ex. One Laptop Per Child) to
> mappers in those countries; working with microfinance organizations
> in those countries to expand the use of OSM in the field; asking OSM
> mappers from the developed world to donate their old GPS units when
> they upgrade; setting up challenge/matching grant programs to
> encourage the OSM community itself to support some of these
> initiatives; etc., etc. My point is that the cost need not be
> extravagant in order to achieve real and significant results.
> As those of us that attended SOtM saw, there are a lot of folks
> doing amazing work in their home countries with access to literally
> one or two GPS units, imagine what could be done if we can provide
> some of these mappers with additional resources! The foundation
> needs to by servers to allow for the massive amounts of detail in
> OSM, I understand that, but give people a reason to feel good about
> contributing to the map and they will participate. If they think
> their contribution to the map is only going to make private
> companies and developers wealthy, where's the incentive?
> My two cents,
> Rafael Morales
> San Francisco, CA
> From: Nick Black <nick at blacksworld.net>
> To: Frederik Ramm <frederik at remote.org>
> Cc: osmf-talk at openstreetmap.org
> Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2009 10:00:29 AM
> Subject: Re: [Osmf-talk] OSMF and evangelism (was: Conflict of
> On 30 Jul 2009, at 16:28, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> > Hi,
> > This is developing into a nice discussion on the very question of
> > OSMF should be and what it shouldn't. I wish we had had this long
> Agree :-)
> > Nick Black wrote:
> >> I want a project that actively goes out,
> >> finds mappers who don't know they are mappers yet and helps them
> >> learn
> >> how to map.
> > Nice if individuals do this - but it cannot be, in my eyes, the
> job of
> > OSMF. We (OSMF) are not there to preach to the world about the
> > goodness
> > of OSM. We are not there to carry OSM into countries that are not
> > interested.
> Just because someone hasn't heard of us doesn't make them not
> interested. Its up to all of us to evangelize our community to the
> > We are not in the business of selling OSM to the world.
> I think we are :-)
> > If
> > there are places where OSM doesn't work as good as it could, then
> > natural reaction should be to just wait until they're ready rather
> > than
> > spending time and money to inseminate them with something that
> > come to them naturally. (You of all people should know that this
> is a
> > difficult undertaking at the very least.)
> I think this attitude is completely at odds with what OSM is all
> about. If Steve had sat around waiting for everyone in the UK to
> realize that there were better ways for people to make and share maps,
> where would we be. I can safely say that I would not have invented
> OSM myself - I'm incredibly glad that someone came to me and told me
> about OSM. The same argument can be made for any of the big
> contributions to OSM.
> Surely all the guys in Germany who got a leaflet through their door of
> in their pizza box are glad that someone took the time to reach out
> for them and we're glad that they are now contributing the project.
> The point of spending time and money is a good one though. The OSM-F
> needs to look at how best to spend its funds.
> > We, OSMF, are in the business of helping OSMers reach *their*
> goals -
> > but it is *them* who set these goals, not us.
> >> A project that helps as many people as possible join the fun.
> > No, not really my thinking. Once they knock on our door and *want*
> > join the fun - yes. But I don't see *us* knocking on doors to tell
> > people how great OSM is.
> But how do they find us? And what if our door is actually the
> drawbridge of a medieval castle. The castle is gleaming in the
> sunlight, but getting through the doorway is too intimidating. That's
> the way OSM and the OSM-F appear to a lot of people. Even the sign-up
> process for the OSM-F scare the life out of a some people and plain
> confuses others. I want OSM to lower its drawbridge, go out into the
> villages and share the feast :-)
> >> When you've got great news isn't it natural to want to share it
> >> people?
> > Too much PR speak for my taste.
> ^ see above for PR speak ;-)
> > *If* OSM project members want to go out
> > and share their good news with the world - all right, it's
> something I
> > do all the time. If someone comes to OSMF and says "I'm a lone
> > here in Kenya and can you help me to get some leaflets printed" - I
> > wouldn't hesitate for a moment to allocate funds and find people to
> > help
> > him. But that's where I draw the line. If I see that the map in
> > leaves things to be desired, I would *not* want OSMF to allocate
> > to go search for people we can send to Kenya to improve mapping
> > or whatever.
> Ok, there's a source of mis-understanding perhaps. What I would
> advocate - and I'm being quite serious - is that we reach out to a few
> Kenyan mappers (there are some on the OSM Dev list for example) and
> see if they need any help. The Foundation could sponsor some of the
> lead mappers to attend SOTM. The Foundation could develop an
> educational syllabus for Kenyan university students so that they can
> use OSM data and OSM tools in the classroom. The Foundation could put
> its support behind renderings of the map in Swahili, or provide money
> so that Kenyan mappers can host tile servers in Nairobi, rather than
> pulling tiles from the OSM London tile server - and suffering from
> terrible latency.
> All of this, I believe, is in the roll of the OSM Foundation. Maybe
> not today, but in the future.
> > I believe the OSMF must be a catalyst - helping out where OSM
> > members are active and ask for help. Also, if we go away from the
> > regional thinking into thematic areas: If there are some people in
> > community who say "we should really do a hacking weekend to get X
> > done",
> > and they ask OSMF for help in organising the event or perhaps
> > in for some of the travel costs or whatever - good idea. I would not
> > want OSMF, however, to try and second guess, or even lead, the
> > ("we really think the community should work more on X so let's
> > them a hacking weekend they haven't asked for").
> I agree that the OSM-F should be community lead - absolutely. So we
> should offer support to the events you describe. But I don't think
> giving a talk to the Nairobi Linux Users Group is trying to second
> guess the community at all. Its what OSM is all about.
> > OSMF can afford to let the community lead and simply follow
> > they go. A business couldn't, or at least would be expected to be
> > in control than OSMF ever has to be.
> There's a big difference between leading and controlling. I don't
> think the OSM-F should control. I do think it should lead, but be
> lead by the community.
> > Bye
> > Frederik
> > --
> > Frederik Ramm ## eMail frederik at remote.org ## N49°00'09"
> > E008°23'33"
> > _______________________________________________
> > osmf-talk mailing list
> > osmf-talk at openstreetmap.org
> > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osmf-talk
> Nick Black
> nick at blacksworld.net
> osmf-talk mailing list
> osmf-talk at openstreetmap.org
> osmf-talk mailing list
> osmf-talk at openstreetmap.org
nick at blacksworld.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the osmf-talk