[Osmf-talk] logo update
mikel_maron at yahoo.com
Mon Dec 19 23:10:30 UTC 2011
>>I don't want to enter that big debate which is pretty nonsensical from my point of view since we just got a logo redesign but I would like to point out that Frederick's work for ODbL is greatly appreciated considering that I work currently to make sure that my area is ODbL compliant which is what we need to work on currently. I think that for the time being that work has been forward looking because without those tools it would be a major nightmare to replace the data.
>If you compare a logo to an ODbL compliance tool in terms of forward thinking for the project, I will choose the tools that Frederick has design over a logo.
>Not taking into consideration that I like the current logo, what is the benefit of working on a new logo? What is the impetus for this? This is not an attempt at trolling but I see that discussion as a distraction to what is important which is the current licence change and there is so much work to do.
>Agreed, Frederik is one of the most amazing contributors to OSM that I know. The tools that Geofabrik have developed, astounding.
Does that mean we can't also talk about a logo? There's no reason to choose. If you don't find it important, don't read this thread or talk about it ... it's simple to not be distracted.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the osmf-talk