[Osmf-talk] Board Cohesion/Confidentiality

SteveCoast steve at asklater.com
Fri Oct 5 14:44:58 UTC 2012

I agree with all of this.

The next question is trust.


On Oct 5, 2012, at 7:31 AM, Tom Hughes <tom at compton.nu> wrote:

> On 05/10/12 15:14, Andy Robinson wrote:
>> As far as I was aware, company Directors have a duty of confidentiality to
>> the company as defined in the 2006 Act (which is based on case law).
> Sure, but that's kind of dependent on what information the company (as embodied by the directors and/or the members) decides should be treated as confidential.
> As far as I can see the law does not, with possible exceptions for things like personal data, specify what is confidential so it would be up to the company to decide what is or is it not in that category.
> Frederik is simply arguing that things should only be treated as such where strictly necessary, and not simply as a default position. In other words that things should be as open as possible.
> Tom
> -- 
> Tom Hughes (tom at compton.nu)
> http://compton.nu/
> _______________________________________________
> osmf-talk mailing list
> osmf-talk at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osmf-talk

More information about the osmf-talk mailing list