[Osmf-talk] Board Cohesion/Confidentiality

Sam Larsen samlarsen1 at yahoo.co.uk
Mon Oct 8 09:00:06 UTC 2012

> I do think the idea of Collective Responsibility is good one.


Please don't impose this crazy Westminster convention on the board.  I support the board being responsible for the decisions they make.  At the same time i emphatically support the right of Frederik or anyone to voice their objections to what the Board is deciding by consensus.  As noted in the cited Wikipedia article, Claire Short's opposition to the invasion of Iraq was a notable exception to this cabinet rule.  I don't want to have a system where board members are pressured to publicly lie about their support for particular decisions like many politicians were when the US & UK invaded Iraq.  I want the board members that i voted for to tell me the truth about what is happening and how they feel about it.

I am happy Frederik has voiced his opinions, i just think it might have been a little less controversial if he had voiced them on this mailing list instead of on his blog.  This is a democratic forum, anyone with a keen interest in OSM can join this list and be included in important discussions about OSM.  It's not the end of the world, we are having some problems that people are trying to work through, but let's get a little perspective - at least we don't have a swarm of a million BIG_GUY bots destroying all our hard work.


>> Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2012 01:27:58 +0200
>> From: MichaelK_OSM at gmx.de
>> To: osmf-talk at openstreetmap.org
>> Subject: Re: [Osmf-talk] Board Cohesion/Confidentiality
>> On 05.10.2012 15:55, Steve Coast wrote:
>> [...]
>> -1 !
>> :-(
>> As there are only two new board members and the quoted email only refers 
>> to one of this persons I would infer that you address Frederik by that 
>> comment. Please correct if this is a wrong understanding.
>> Maybe there is a language barrier between Frederik and yourself. But (I 
>> think) I very much understand what he writes in the blog that is linked. 
>> And he does not at all want to publish all that's discussed while board 
>> meeting. He just requests to "be as open as possible". And he request 
>> clear rules for the work of the board which I as a comunity and OSMF 
>> member would consider to be normal and already in place! If not in place 
>> that's a bad thing. He also takes the example of Wikimedia which has a 
>> "board with clear rules" which is very much linked to open content: open 
>> content and open communication does not object to secret discussions.
>> But maybe I understand Frederik easier as I have the same German 
>> thinking as Frederik and the British/American thinking/understanding is 
>> different. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
>> Best regards,
>> Michael.
>> _______________________________________________
>> osmf-talk mailing list
>> osmf-talk at openstreetmap.org
>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osmf-talk
>osmf-talk mailing list
>osmf-talk at openstreetmap.org

More information about the osmf-talk mailing list