[Osmf-talk] OSMF Articles of Association - Discussion on Revision for 2013 AGM

Mikel Maron mikel_maron at yahoo.com
Fri Apr 5 12:24:45 UTC 2013

Simon, to me these look fine; I have no opinion on STV. The one thing I'm unclear on is what it takes for membership resolutions to pass ... majority of those in attendance a General Meeting?
Also, I'm curious to hear what kinds of things might be proposed through membership resolutions.
* Mikel Maron * +14152835207 @mikel s:mikelmaron

> From: Simon Poole <simon at poole.ch>
>To: osmf-talk at openstreetmap.org 
>Sent: Friday, April 5, 2013 8:15 AM
>Subject: Re: [Osmf-talk] OSMF Articles of Association - Discussion on Revision for 2013 AGM
>I'm slightly surprised that there is no discussion on points 4 to 6. In
>particular I would have at least thought that some discussion on the
>democratic elements (resolutions from outside of the board) would  take
>place. Can we in that case assume that everybody is fine with the
>proposals as suggested (without any restriction on proposals)?
>Am 19.03.2013 00:35, schrieb Simon Poole:
>> The discussion on points 1-3
>> (http://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/2013_OSMF_Articles_of_Association_Update)
>> seems to be exhausted. Besides the clarifications I already built in, I
>> believe the only point to be noted for inclusion was the wish for a
>> grace period wrt paying the annual membership fee. I suspect that that
>> can be added .
>> If nobody wants a straw poll, I would suggest moving to the discussion
>> of points 4 to 6. All three are procedural wrt GMs.
>> Simon
>> _______________________________________________
>> osmf-talk mailing list
>> osmf-talk at openstreetmap.org
>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osmf-talk
>osmf-talk mailing list
>osmf-talk at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/osmf-talk/attachments/20130405/bf6616ee/attachment.html>

More information about the osmf-talk mailing list