[Osmf-talk] Upcoming Special General Meeting Opinions?
MichaelK_OSM at gmx.de
Sat Dec 6 17:18:29 UTC 2014
On 03.12.2014 12:56, Kathleen Danielson wrote
> We've been essentially paralyzed for the past month because of these
> resolutions, and voting in the ordinary resolution will keep us as a
> "lame duck" board for at least 6 more weeks. Let us do the job you
> elected us to do.
But there has been a loud shout for reboot of the board by completely
stepping down. Some board members have been willing to do so.
And in the current discussion there was also the argument that "board
members have a benefit in votings" (which I also think). So why did they
have a problem with a complete step down of the board?
For me ist seems that some board members are sticking to their board
chairs. Why? The moast of the important work is done in the WGs, this is
not affected by a tem limit. And nobody says that "good board members"
should not stay in the WGs as a "ordinary member"...
To prevent against sticking on chairs a time limit is an appropriate
So for me this is no argument against a term limit, quite the contrary
it is an argument for term limits. => vote YES for the proposel raised
More information about the osmf-talk