[Osmf-talk] Reinvigorating working groups. Join in!
sotm at livingwithdragons.com
Mon Dec 8 23:13:37 UTC 2014
In the past there were talks of a Funding Working Group. That may have
turned into the Strategic Working Group.
I think it would be good to have such a WG. Primarily because when
companies are giving away money out of the good-of-their-heart budget or
advertising budget, they expect to deal with the same person in the
receiving organisation. They also like it if that organisation remembers
the best time to contact them, or indeed when and what-for they last gave
money. Additional, the past has seen issues due to clashing OSMF funding
requests or otherwise badly timed requests that could have been
I suppose such a Funding Working Group would have tasks such as:
* Co-ordinate needs and desires for money in OSMF at specific times.
* Work closely with & supporting WGs such as Operations(server needs),
Communications(announcing funding drives), and SotM(sponsorship).
* Pass agreement details onto the OSMF treasurer and/or accountant.
* Contact external companies and maintain a good relationship with them.
* Maintain records for transparency of what financial relationships exist.
It may be wise & acceptable for some information to be kept private, such
as which companies choose not to give on some/any occasions, and bank
I don't think I'm particularly skilled to take this on & I'd like to be
increasing my time with another WG. Is there anyone that is interested?
People the WG might need (not exhaustive):
* Overview and directional skills to get this WG going
* Minuting skills & following up if people do assigned skills
* Enthusiasm for OSM to think up/list companies that it would be cool to
have support us
* Enthusiasm for OSM to contact a company and tell them about OSMF's latest
* Relational skills for maintaining contact with an individual of a
company. You may maintain links with 50 companies, or only 10 or 1.
I can just suggest that this WG needs to happen, but it's really good if
people take this up as something they want to be part of. No good if it's
taken up completely by people helping 5 other WGs already because it will
just fall by the way-side again.
On 8 December 2014 at 21:07, Richard Weait <richard at weait.com> wrote:
> There have been recent discussions about reinvigorating various
> OpenStreetMap Foundation Working Groups.
> Recent board minutes indicated the membership management would be
> moved from a board position membership secretary to a working group
> Michael Collinson spoke  of his interest in seeing new people and
> more people participating in Working Groups, based on his experiences
> and earlier work by Matt Amos.
> I wrote recently about who might join a working group, why, and
> what they might be able to offer a working group. Shortly after I
> published that, Jono Bacon tweeted an image that struck me as helpful,
> inspirational and super appropriate for OpenStreetMap. So, I wrote
> about that as well. 
> In addition to the new membership WG, there will be announcements for
> others. Michael Collinson spoke of the need for more participation in
> LWG and if I remember correctly MT. There will be at least one
> more, shortly, but it isn't mine to announce. :-)
> Best regards and happy mapping,
> You do not have to be an expert, or know all of the answers, to be
> valuable to a working group. You can join armed only with enthusiasm,
> though organizational skills and communication skills are a benefit.
>  earlier on this osmf-talk@ list
>  http://weait.com/working-groups-1
>  http://weait.com/on-ramp
>  corrections and clarifications welcome, of course.
>  who previously participated in several working groups at various times.
> osmf-talk mailing list
> osmf-talk at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the osmf-talk