[Osmf-talk] OSMF Members Request for a General Meeting
steve at asklater.com
Sat Nov 15 00:04:32 UTC 2014
Supporting shorter term limits, which I do, isn’t the same thing as "remove all the people Simon dislikes in a few weeks”.
For example, members could be allowed to finish their terms. For example, it could be staggered in. For example, it could be done at the end of this board term.
Instead, we have a fairly transparent effort to remove a bunch of good people.
What I’d love the board to focus on is how to get new members, build new things, meet face to face or any number of other good things. Instead everything is on hold pending this nonsense. Or maybe that’s the point, so you can run again once they’ve been removed?
> On Nov 14, 2014, at 4:48 PM, Simon Poole <simon at poole.ch> wrote:
> Am 14.11.2014 22:34, schrieb Steve Coast:
>> .... Wording resolutions to remove everyone he and his buddy Simon dislike shouldn’t be entirely surprising.
> I originally suggested a 6 years limit, but then Kathleen and this bloke
> named Steve Coast suggested that the term limit be shorter, see
> Yes I did, unprompted, sorry for that, add a method to reset the term
> limit so that all these people I hate could get back on the board after
> a pause (note: sarcasm).
> osmf-talk mailing list
> osmf-talk at openstreetmap.org
More information about the osmf-talk