[Osmf-talk] 2014 AGM AoA revision
simon at poole.ch
Wed Oct 1 12:31:37 UTC 2014
Am 01.10.2014 14:10, schrieb Andy Allan:
> Furthermore, the first one (273) is only for public companies, so it's
> not clear what's going on - what was the thinking behind the original
> intention to include 273 (and 274) in the first place, and given that
> original intention, what's the thinking behind removing the
> requirements now? I think this information would need to be provided
> at the vote.
I don't believe there was any "thinking" :-) Likely it was simply a C&P
error that nobody caught way back in 2006. 273 is simply irrelevant,
because as you say it is only relevant for public companies, which the
OSMF is not. And further the explicit reference to 274 is not needed
according to counsel, the description aptly being "needless cruft".
> As an aside, "the Act" appears in the AoA without definition, whereas
> the definition of "Companies Acts" is unused anywhere in the AoA :-)
We'll keep that one for the next time :-)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the osmf-talk