[Osmf-talk] Running
Simon Poole
simon at poole.ch
Tue Oct 28 00:35:08 UTC 2014
Kevin,
my sincere apologies if the discussions are causing you concern.
If it is any consolation this is 7 years of pent up problems being
discussed, some of them go back even further to the very beginning of
OSM, long before you or I had anything to do with it. They just were
never resolved, just ignored or swept under the rug. Not discussing them
is not going to help getting over them and I don't think there is any
reasonable way we can protect newcomers from seeing some pretty ugly
things right now.
Simon
Am 28.10.2014 00:52, schrieb Kevin Arruda:
> I've recently joined OSMF (just two weeks ago) and was absolutely
> stunned by the email reflector conversation. The impression it gives
> of OSMF is abysmal. In all my years working with standards/consortium
> bodies, I have never seen something like this on the general reflector.
>
> OSMF is growing quickly as I understand, so perhaps some thought
> should be given to what conversations new members are exposed to
> without discretion.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Kevin
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 9:18 PM, Martijn van Exel <m at rtijn.org
> <mailto:m at rtijn.org>> wrote:
>
> I am just so mystified by these personal attacks and disappointed
> to see the conversation spin out of control like this, especially
> when fuelled by folks who have otherwise done great things for
> this project. If you have a personal score to settle with Steve
> (or anyone for that matter), we all would be better off if you
> would refrain from piggybacking your gripes onto what was a pretty
> civil discussion.
>
> Get some rest.
>
> Martijn
>
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 8:00 PM, Harry Wood <mail at harrywood.co.uk
> <mailto:mail at harrywood.co.uk>> wrote:
>
> To be fair to Steve, he is a bit less antagonistic when you
> meet him in person, but who isn't? I agree with Sarah
> Hoffmann's description of him
>
> > Steve has a long history of being impossible to discuss with
> and of
>
> > personally insulting pretty much anybody who disagrees with him.
>
> > He has managed to wear out pretty much anybody who is a bit
> more deeply
> > involved in the project
>
> So to my mind it's very bad news when Steve announces he wants
> to be more involved again. Simon Poole clearly feels the same.
> What a shame.
>
> When Steve announced "MapClub" and "OSMPlus", my thought was
> that they're interesting ideas, and if they came from anyone
> else I would've supported them, but having new parts of
> OpenStreetMap with Steve at the helm is really the last thing
> we need.
>
> They were also problematic from a "competition" point of view,
> but I think Kai raises an interesting point, that complaining
> about this competition is a bit at odds with the "keep OSMF
> small and lean" viewpoint.
>
> I subscribe to that viewpoint. Hiring lots of people and
> growing OSMF doesn't need to be the goal. But we need to be
> clear about what that means when it comes to "sister"
> organisations. It surely means they should be encouraged. It
> means we should try to solve more OSM problems, build more
> structure, and move more money around outside of the OSMF.
> Personally I think we should also have agreements in place
> which cement OSMF as a relevant central organisation with
> secure funding. But that's a complicated issue which the board
> needs to work on.
>
> ...and all the while the chairman emeritus of the OSMF will
> "try new things" when we least expect it.
>
> Harry
>
> _______________________________________________
> osmf-talk mailing list
> osmf-talk at openstreetmap.org <mailto:osmf-talk at openstreetmap.org>
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osmf-talk
>
>
>
>
> --
> Martijn van Exel
> skype: mvexel
>
> _______________________________________________
> osmf-talk mailing list
> osmf-talk at openstreetmap.org <mailto:osmf-talk at openstreetmap.org>
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osmf-talk
>
>
>
>
> --
> .......................................................
> Kevin Arruda
> arruda.k at gmail.com <mailto:arruda.k at gmail.com>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> osmf-talk mailing list
> osmf-talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osmf-talk
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/osmf-talk/attachments/20141028/a081488f/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/osmf-talk/attachments/20141028/a081488f/attachment.sig>
More information about the osmf-talk
mailing list