[Osmf-talk] Draft New Corporate Membership Tiers
chris_hormann at gmx.de
Wed Apr 27 19:28:41 UTC 2016
On Wednesday 27 April 2016, Kate Chapman wrote:
> [...] but
> they have their own General Counsel that would like to speak to
> another lawyer. This is typically how companies operate
Yes, but this is usually to make legal deals, often of confidential
nature, for mutural benefit. For the OSM project this kind of deal is
IMO neither possible nor desirable.
> Calls with board members: This is intended to help people internally
> "sell" the corporate membership within their organizations.
And what is the selling point here if not the implied influence on OSMF
> Though if organizations are interested in this why not help fund the
Because it is not necessarily in the interest of the OSM community. It
seems to me trying to offer what corporations ask for is not a good
approach because this would ultimately mean submitting to their
interests for the purpose of making money. Better to ask what the OSMF
and the OSM community have to offer that could be of interest for
corporations, whether they already know it or not - and that is
primarily experience and knowledge w.r.t. the OSM project. Offering to
share this kind of expertise to me seems much more appropriate for a
cooperation on a level playing field.
Yes, offering this as a service is difficult to do without the
administrative overhead eating up most of the money. But you could
view this more as brokering contacts between experienced community
members and corporations without actually giving advise and training
yourself. This could still be worth a lot to many companies because
for them it is often difficult to find the right people to approach
with problems and questions they have.
More information about the osmf-talk