[Osmf-talk] Fwd: Candidacy: OSMF Board

[Heather Leson]

Stefan and OSMF members, I posted my response last night but have not
received any followup directly related to that.

As for the sub-comments, I have some thoughts, but first I would like to
start with my main response:

Summary:
1. My detailed response on the content and underlying questions
2. No one (full stop). And, No one, OSMF and OSM should be treated this
way. We can do more, we can do better.

Thank you

Heather

Heather Leson
heatherleson at gmail.com
Twitter/skype: HeatherLeson
Blog: textontechs.com

On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 1:52 PM, Stefan Keller <sfkeller at gmail.com> wrote:

> Kate, Ben, all,
>
> Perhaps I'm missing something, but I did not yet get your questions to
> the candidate(s).
> I think we've all agreed that Severins reply was rude.
> So, let's get back on this thread.
> Some - including me - have put questions and/or criteria on the table.
> Now I hope the candidates (here: Heather) get a chance to comment on those.
>
> --Stefan
>
>
> 2017-11-24 13:40 GMT+01:00 Christoph Hormann <chris_hormann at gmx.de>:
> > On Friday 24 November 2017, Ben Abelshausen wrote:
> >>
> >> If it truly is the case that only those related to HOT are speaking
> >> out against this kind of behaviour then I think the OSMF has big
> >> problems with how it treats it's members.
> >>
> >> I haven't checked who is a member where so I don't know. Why is that
> >> even the issue? The only thing I was saying is that this kind of way
> >> of treating others is a step too far. What does my membership
> >> anywhere else have to do with any of this?
> >
> > Ben,
> >
> > may i suggest you take a minute when replying to people in this
> > discussion and read what you reply to carefully to make sure to
> > interpret what is written in the way it is meant?
> >
> > I have been very considerate and calm in this discussion explaining my
> > views carefully and as clear as i can and reading what i replied to
> > carefully to make sure i correctly understand everyone - despite being
> > more than once interpreted in a distorting way by others (like by you
> > above).
> >
> > The statements and questions from you i cited above are clearly
> > suggestive and full with implications but without expressively stating
> > an opinion others can reply to.  If you read my mail carefully you will
> > see the questions you formulated are actually answered in there from my
> > perspective.  You could reply to what i wrote arguing the points i make
> > and try to convince me to change my mind but you choose not to.
> >
> > IMO it is much more this style of communication that leads to a
> > difficult and non-productive atmosphere here than the singular
> > unfriendly mail by Severin that triggered the whole thing.
> >
> > --
> > Christoph Hormann
> > http://www.imagico.de/
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > osmf-talk mailing list
> > osmf-talk at openstreetmap.org
> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osmf-talk
>
> _______________________________________________
> osmf-talk mailing list
> osmf-talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osmf-talk
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/osmf-talk/attachments/20171124/43265826/attachment.html>