[Osmf-talk] Support for DWG (Was Re: Reminder - Etiquette guidelines)

Marc Gemis marc.gemis at gmail.com
Sun Nov 25 18:01:54 UTC 2018

 I think the DWG handled correctly in the current dispute on the
boundary mapping in the Crimea.

The disputed border policy has to be respected. Of course a new one
could be discussed, an we can also work on a new tagging schema for
disputed borders.
This would be much more useful than calling OSMF and the DWG names.

I really appreciate the effort that e.g. SomeElse put in replying to
those accusations.



On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 6:49 PM Christoph Hormann <chris_hormann at gmx.de> wrote:
> On Sunday 25 November 2018, nebulon42 wrote:
> > (I think the English translation that deepl.com produces of my German
> > comment is quite accurate.)
> I noticed only after having posted my German commentary how hopelessly
> inapt various translation AIs are in dealing with my Germany style of
> writing.  While it might seem this way it was not my intention to
> specifically make it difficult to translate.
> Ansonsten allen unterst├╝tzenden wie auch kritischen Kommentaren zu dem
> was ich geschrieben habe vielen Dank.
> And i want to specifically underline Frederik's suggestion to provide
> support for the DWG in their work to implement OSMF policy and defend
> the values of the project against attempts to politicize it.
> --
> Christoph Hormann
> http://www.imagico.de/
> _______________________________________________
> osmf-talk mailing list
> osmf-talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osmf-talk

More information about the osmf-talk mailing list