[Osmf-talk] voting fraud

Nuno Caldeira nunocapelocaldeira at gmail.com
Tue Feb 5 23:14:03 UTC 2019

Hi, was being sarcastic.

Às 22:42 de 05/02/2019, Kathleen Lu via osmf-talk escreveu:
>     As far as I recall, nobody has suggested the 100+ individuals have or
>     had sinister reasons. If somebody is claiming that, let's discuss it
>     separately.
>     If nobody is claiming that, putting it forward is derailing the
>     discussion.
> Hi Rihards,
> Perhaps you missed it, since this thread has gotten quite lengthy, but 
> in my first message I replied directly to Nuno, who wrote:
> "One question, *not a single* one of these, recently called *100 
> "humans" expressed concern, doubts or showed any sign of not being 
> able to vote*? 100, not 10, 100 that did not express themselves about 
> not being able to vote. Lets me think that people in India are very 
> shy indeed. Lucky we got 900 members and those "100 humans" were just 
> 1/10 of the members."
> Perhaps he was being sarcastic, as Guillaume suggested, or there is a 
> language barrier issue here, but I read it very much as casting 
> aspersions on the motivations of the individual employees, and that's 
> why I replied.
> -Kathleen
> _______________________________________________
> osmf-talk mailing list
> osmf-talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osmf-talk
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/osmf-talk/attachments/20190205/abbc2c6f/attachment.html>

More information about the osmf-talk mailing list