[Osmf-talk] [OSM-talk] Attribution guideline status update

Nuno Caldeira nunocapelocaldeira at gmail.com
Thu Oct 31 21:30:34 UTC 2019


Às 18:29 de 31/10/2019, Yves escreveu:
> For me, a 'fair use' of a screenshot in any blog post, imply a 
> citation of the source material. If the source material is derived 
> from OSM data, a notice of the OSM source and license is to be added, 
> at least in the footer.
> My concern here is not US law, but in an article about nice maps, 
> failing to do so tells me a lot about the writing skills of the author. 


-Obviously, it's a basic academic value. Nothing happens as mistakes. 
Worst of this is that it comes from a Corporate Member of OSMF.

https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Corporate_Members

>
>       Foundation and community expectations
>
> We expect Corporate Members to conduct themselves as good citizens of 
> the OpenStreetMap ecosystem, e.g. by complying with our attribution 
> requirements (Licence and Legal FAQ 
> <https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Licence_and_Legal_FAQ>), 
> following good editing practice and adhering to the community's 
> guidelines, such as the Licence/Community Guidelines 
> <https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Community_Guidelines> and 
> the Organised Editing Guidelines 
> <https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines>.
>
But let's be honest, what will happen? Nothing, just blantly ignore it 
and fair use it. seems fair

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/osmf-talk/attachments/20191031/e4b1705f/attachment.html>


More information about the osmf-talk mailing list