[Osmf-talk] Possible vote on membership prerequisites
kathleen.lu at mapbox.com
Mon Nov 2 17:56:53 UTC 2020
In that case, might I suggest that you frame this as a nonbinding
resolution, for the membership to indicate support (or not) for such
exploration, with no pre-determined outcome.
It is entirely possible that after a more thorough legal and community
review, either the Board or MWG might come to view such a proposal as
legally fraught, logistically unworkable, or undesirable for some other
reason. There is also the possibility that some emergency might require the
Board's full attention on other matters. A legally binding resolution could
tie up resources in suboptimal ways.
On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 9:38 AM Tobias Knerr <osm at tobias-knerr.de> wrote:
> Hi Kathleen,
> On 02.11.20 04:17, Kathleen Lu wrote:
> > I'm not sure though why the Board and MWG getting together to study the
> > issue requires a resolution? Is it not already within their prerogative
> > to investigate the issue and draft proposals?
> You're right that drafting a proposal does not require a resolution. But
> this first vote would allow us to gauge whether prerequisites are
> something the membership even wants, and how broad the support is.
> Given that there are different views on the matter even within the
> board, I think this is valuable input. It may turn out that the
> membership doesn't like the concept at all, in which case our time is
> better spent working on other ideas. On the other hand, if a broad
> majority supports it, the board + MWG would have a clear mandate to put
> in the effort of fleshing out a full proposal.
> In essence, this is an opportunity for the membership to let us know
> whether we're on to something or wasting energy on a dead end.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the osmf-talk