[Osmf-talk] Board never refused to consider licence change | Re: Draft Attribution Guidelines, possible vote at end of this month & new guidelines.

R. A. McCann rory at technomancy.org
Tue Jun 15 19:27:24 UTC 2021


On 15/06/2021 19:59, Simon Poole wrote:> we can revise the current licence … the board 
> refused to even consider the 2nd, even though it would have the 
> advantage of a democratic process to determine the outcome, not to 
> mention that we could have fixed the couple of existing bloopers in the 
> licence at the same time.

Huh? The Board has never considered revising the licence. It's never come up on my time on the board. No-one's actually suggested it. It's not a case that the board “refused to consider it”.



More information about the osmf-talk mailing list