[Osmf-talk] Board never refused to consider licence change | Re: Draft Attribution Guidelines, possible vote at end of this month & new guidelines.

[Simon Poole]

Consult the LWGs minutes at the time, they are public.

Am 15. Juni 2021 21:27:24 MESZ schrieb "R. A. McCann" <rory at technomancy.org>:
>On 15/06/2021 19:59, Simon Poole wrote:> we can revise the current licence … the board 
>> refused to even consider the 2nd, even though it would have the 
>> advantage of a democratic process to determine the outcome, not to 
>> mention that we could have fixed the couple of existing bloopers in the 
>> licence at the same time.
>
>Huh? The Board has never considered revising the licence. It's never come up on my time on the board. No-one's actually suggested it. It's not a case that the board “refused to consider it”.

-- 
Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit Kaiten Mail gesendet.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/osmf-talk/attachments/20210615/c619946d/attachment.htm>