[Rebuild] Large relations - rules and tools

[ant]

Hi,

On 01.02.2012 12:20, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
> Therefore, I'd like to suggest a modification: route relations are assumed
> to have a clean v0 which is an empty, untagged set. v1 is treated as a
> modification of the relation (adding tags and members).

this is a nice assumption I wouldn't hesitate to apply to all kinds of 
objects. For it hasn't dawned on me why a modification done by a 
non-agreer is considered more "severe" if it happened to be v1.

cheers
ant