[Tagging] [OSM-talk] connection between 2 islands
andreengels at gmail.com
Tue Dec 1 07:34:43 GMT 2009
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 4:48 AM, Cartinus <cartinus at xs4all.nl> wrote:
> On Monday 30 November 2009 23:36:27 Simone Saviolo wrote:
>> I'm not sure I understood the WIki correctly - either that, or Osmarender
>> doesn't do what the wiki says. In this place , the railway runs on a
>> raised finger of land, as described in the wiki. So I put two parallel ways
>> on both sides of the railway and tagged them as embankments; but the
>> resulting render suggests that one way would be enough. What is the
>> intended use of the embankment tag?
> Embankments that share a way with a highway, railway or waterway are rendered
> with "spikes" on both sides. (Currently only in Osmarender.)
> Micro-mapped embankments should be rendered with the left-hand side of the way
> being the high side and the right-hand side being the low side. (Currently
> nothing supports this however.)
> Like I wrote in the wiki a few hours ago: The micro-mapping approach is not
> supported by anything. Osmarender is the only renderer (known to me) that
> does anything with embankments and it only looks good if you use
> embankment=yes or man_made=embankment on the same way as the
The problem with the micro-mapping approach is, in my opinion, that it
forces the renderer to interpret something that's not directly in the
data, by using the same notation for two very different situations,
namely a single, broad embankment and two embankments running parallel
in the same vicinity.
If one wants to show the width of the embankment, I think the more
correct thing to do would be to have the embaknkment be one closed
curve, perhaps also with area=yes attached. This however would have
the problem of getting the 'spikes' also at the beginning and the end.
Another option would be to add a tag "embankment_side =
left/right/both" with "both" being the default value.
André Engels, andreengels at gmail.com
More information about the Tagging