[Tagging] Proposed definition for cycleways (was Re: bicycle=no)

Pieren pieren3 at gmail.com
Wed Jan 6 12:12:12 GMT 2010

On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 12:47 PM, Steve Bennett
> Is it "old" as in, obsolete? Should we make an Australian entry, or is it no
> longer relevant?

It is an old page because designation and default access is an old
topic and there is no "black and white" answer. In some countries,
when you tag a cycleway, it is obviously not allowed for pedestrians
and contributors do not want to be forced to add a foot=no because in
some other countries it is "obviously" allowed. It's like asking the
whole world to add a bicycle=no with highway=motorway because it is
allowed in some US motorways.
It would be very helpful to see an Australian entry in this page, of course.


More information about the Tagging mailing list