[Tagging] Tidying up arts venues

Noel David Torres Taño envite at rolamasao.org
Sat Nov 6 13:31:33 GMT 2010

On Sábado 06 Noviembre 2010 11:39:07 Tom Chance escribió:
> On 6 November 2010 11:29, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com>wrote:
> > 2010/11/6 Tom Chance <tom at acrewoods.net>:
> > > Should I tidy up the music_venue proposal and bring it to a vote under
> > 
> > the
> > 
> > > tourism key
> > > Is the current split between amenity / tourism about right?
> > 
> > no, it is completly pointless to put a museum, art_gallery, artwork or
> > music_venue in the same category with tags like tourism=information.
> > The first have nothing more to do with tourism than a subway station
> > or a restaurant.
> > 
> > IMHO we should have a new main tag "culture".
> I like the idea of a "culture" key. Would you like to draft a proposal?
> For now, in the absence of that key, we have to decide whether these
> features sit in amenity or tourism. The wiki makes the distinction by
> saying that amenities are "important" and tourist features are other
> interesting things to see. So I think it makes sense for current proposals
> like art galleries to sit in tourism, and perhaps in the future to move
> those along with theatres, cinemas, nightclubs, etc. under a culture key
> if that proposal was voted through.
> Regards,
> Tom

No, in general culture is not meant for tourism. Theaters, cinemas and museums 
are (in the case of museums should be) mainly for locals, so I agree deeply 
with culture=*

er Envite

More information about the Tagging mailing list