[Tagging] RFC: new key Landcover

Richard Welty rwelty at averillpark.net
Tue Nov 16 17:48:51 GMT 2010

On 11/16/10 12:43 PM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> no, that would be surface as well. I'd say the distinction is between
> the surface and the coverage (which comprises the surface).
> surface=bush or tree would not make any sense IMHO. surface=asphalt is
> fine for the surface, the landcover would be the street which is not
> only the surface of the street.
my attempt at clarification: surface is used where the mapped
entity is man-made (or modified, e.g. dirt roads.)


More information about the Tagging mailing list