[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - power generator rationalisation

[Richard Welty]

  On 9/3/10 6:16 PM, Pierre-Alain Dorange wrote:
> I do not follow this discussion, but automatic data update is generally
> not welcome on OSM.
> It can/would modify data made by people that don't know your discussion
> and would be hurt by a big modification behind there back.
>
>
i'd be more concerned about updates without proper quality control
plans.

1) how would you propose to inspect the results?

2) what is the fallback plan if the results are unsatisfactory?

richard