[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Kerb
josh at joshdoe.com
Thu Jun 23 05:32:54 BST 2011
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 8:07 PM, Seth Golub <seth at sethoscope.net> wrote:
> It seems that kerb=flush is saying that there is no kerb. kerb=no seems
> more intuitive, and probably some people will use it no matter what the wiki
> says, so why have flush at all?
Flush kerbs are important to note especially for the blind, as they don't
have a sudden or even gradual change in height to let them know they're
about to cross a road.
"lowered" seems to mean "raised, but not very much". I imagine the intent
> was "lowered compared to the otherwise raised sidewalk", but all the other
> values are relative to the road. Instead it implies "lower than the road".
Lowered was used in the original proposal, I'd actually prefer the term
sloped. I think that makes quite a bit more sense than lowered. Opinions?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging