[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Kerb

[Robert Naylor]

On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 05:32:54 +0100, Josh Doe <josh at joshdoe.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 8:07 PM, Seth Golub <seth at sethoscope.net> wrote:
>
> Lowered was used in the original proposal, I'd actually prefer the term
> sloped. I think that makes quite a bit more sense than lowered. Opinions?
>

I preferred lowered as slopped doesn't describe which way it slopes, it  
could actually easily slope up higher than usual.  It'd be a crazy thing  
to do at a crossing - but then I have seen the council do some crazy  
thing's in the past.

It could also be potentially mistaken for the rolled kerbs.