[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Kerb
robert at pobice.co.uk
Thu Jun 23 09:11:30 BST 2011
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 05:32:54 +0100, Josh Doe <josh at joshdoe.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 8:07 PM, Seth Golub <seth at sethoscope.net> wrote:
> Lowered was used in the original proposal, I'd actually prefer the term
> sloped. I think that makes quite a bit more sense than lowered. Opinions?
I preferred lowered as slopped doesn't describe which way it slopes, it
could actually easily slope up higher than usual. It'd be a crazy thing
to do at a crossing - but then I have seen the council do some crazy
thing's in the past.
It could also be potentially mistaken for the rolled kerbs.
More information about the Tagging