[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Turn Lanes

Ilpo Järvinen ilpo.jarvinen at helsinki.fi
Thu Oct 6 11:03:21 BST 2011


On Thu, 6 Oct 2011, Pieren wrote:

> On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 11:10 AM, Ilpo Järvinen
> <ilpo.jarvinen at helsinki.fi> wrote:
> > however, it should not be solved using some data klugde but
> > making the tasks you mention easy to do in editors even if the ways would
> > contain only two nodes each.
> 
> Making the task easier in editor does not work if your schema is
> complex. You can see the current turning lane plugin on JOSM.. .
> I was also thinking about a solution like yours but again, we split
> ways for what I consider a minor information (turning lanes).

Quote from you:
"It's just painful to work with many small segments (to add or rename
tags or use route relations)"

I don't understand how the turning lanes plugin has anything to do with 
the basics tasks you describe. It should be relatively easy to have some 
form of "router" in editor to handle route relation building, it would 
help even with longer ways enormously (I think there might be some 
routing plugin for josm but I haven't tried it and it's not enough to 
route as some splitting is occassionally needed).

The first task could be as simple as right-clicking on the tag you want
to extend the selection for (mostly one would be doing names). Kind of 
auto-find without need to write the actual find line (but needs to take 
connectivity into account I suppose).

> And the
> results are quicly becoming unreadable, ex.:
> "lanes:directions:backward=s;s;p"

I also dislike this format. Such shorts are horrible. And if 
autogenerated by tools anyway why not autogenerate the full versions!?!

> My idea is to stay simple, only for car turning lanes because most of
> the contributors will not spend many time for such things (to not say
> that most of the contributors do not tag lanes at all).

I don't have any idea what you're now talking about. What are the simple 
(and useful) tasks you can do, if the most roads are there already, which 
do not involve stuff you'd define "minor information" (which I find highly 
subjective btw, I find the physical number of lanes pretty relevant)?


-- 
 i.


More information about the Tagging mailing list