[Tagging] Wide steps
david at frankieandshadow.com
Fri Oct 7 19:18:38 BST 2011
On 07/10/2011 18:13, Peter Wendorff wrote:
> I'm not sure, but perhaps the area:highway-proposal  is useful here.
There are already numerous highway areas for things like market places
and piazzas, but it's done as highway=x;area=yes, not with its own key.
These are properly rendered on Mapnik (e.g.
(I don't see any need to change this unless we adopt a proper area
> Before we have to discuss the general pros and cons of that proposal: I
> don't think it's necessary to tag all streets with an area (but it would
> be possible, sure), and I don't think, it's useful to do so in general
> before we have tools to support that.
> But I think, in cases where the line generalization of a highway is not
> enough - like it's here in the steps issue, it would be useful to do that.
As I said, yes, an area for what is a significant area rather than a
linear feature is the obvious method, but the difficulty with steps is
indicating which side(s) are the top and bottom. (We also have L shaped
step areas, and semi-circular ones among others I have come across in
the last week).
> The additional highway:steps would stay at separate ways "on top" of the
This shouldn't be necessary, any more than any other highway area. It's
like putting a node for parking in the middle of a parking area.
More information about the Tagging