[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - entrance=*

Erik Johansson erjohan at gmail.com
Thu Oct 13 00:08:30 BST 2011

On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 12:52 AM, Ilpo Järvinen
<ilpo.jarvinen at helsinki.fi> wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Oct 2011, Erik Johansson wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 11:12 PM, Ilya Zverev <zverik at textual.ru> wrote:
>> aren't we better of without building=entrance? I really
>> hope that DWG can be kept out of this.
>> Further I would like to propose railway=subway_entrance =>
>> entrance=public_transport, since it's probably interesting to have on
>> bus/boat/rail terminals as well, now this is a bit more tricky sinceer
>> it already renders.
> Please let me know when did my private renderer for those
> building=entrances cease being something that renders (besides the times
> when my VM is down of course :-))? ...Honestly, I think you just _assumed_
> that nobody is using the data for anything

I assumed you would love to get rid of that tag, I might not have put
it in the best way so I'll include what was said by Tobias:

> Tobias Knerr:
>> What makes this case interesting beyond the relatively trivial tagging
>>  issue is that it raises the question whether we, as a community, are
>> able to revise earlier decisions.

>> To me it seems obvious that we need the ability to do so.
>> But it is also apparent that we have no working process - not even an
>> informal one - for handling data model changes.


More information about the Tagging mailing list