[Tagging] Advice & clarification of the railway tracks=* tag required.

[Dave F.]

On 14/08/2012 11:13, David Fisher wrote:
> > Problem : if you check the data, you see that RM added the new tag but
> > did not revert his wrong interpretation of the old "tracks".
>
> Well, I'd see that as a side-issue, rather than a "problem" to be honest.

It was the only reason I initially contacted him. My 'sniping' is 
because RM repeatedly attempts to side-step the fact he got things wrong 
& has left inaccurate data. With almost four years experience he 
shouldn't need 'mediation' on such a simple procedure.

Dave F.