[Tagging] How to solve the problem with relation overload?

Jo winfixit at gmail.com
Fri Nov 30 10:39:37 GMT 2012

2012/11/30 Pieren <pieren3 at gmail.com>

> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Martin Vonwald <imagic.osm at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Are we sure that those relations provide more information than they
> > prevent to be provided?
> In the example you are pointing, 6 of the 9 relations are for the Bus
> 311. I never map public transport relations but I've seen its modeling
> expanding very far in complexity in recent time (fault is also because
> some routes are complexe anyway). The amount of route relations will
> increase in the future, this is unavoidable. I personally don't care
> about such relations until they make our normal edits unmanageable.
> One solution could be to bring super-relations in general use. Or find
> another modeling for routes (e.g. with intersection nodes only).

I think we should go to route relations consisting of route sections, as
described here:


which I tried to apply to this relation:


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20121130/c1394c6c/attachment.html>

More information about the Tagging mailing list