osm-listen at ivkasogis.de
Fri Dec 6 23:01:23 UTC 2013
Am Freitag, den 06.12.2013, 15:20 +0100 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
> > Am 06/dic/2013 um 13:39 schrieb cracklinrain <cra_klinrain at gmx.de>:
> > Well, I would say a stone garden without plants is probably still a
> > garden. But an area made of concrete is still a (small) yard or else. If
> > it's too strange it should be tagged as artwork maybe.
> > But by definition it seems that the aspect of existing plants is important.
> it will be decided by the mapper on occasion.
> I have seen some quite unusual gardens with very few plants, but generally you'd expect them in a garden (something could be a garden and a piece of art or design at the same time). Also zen gardens which AFAIK are mostly pebbles rather than lawn, will still have some tree (or bonsaii tree).
The question remains how to tag: one area of ~50-100 private gardens as
leisure=garden including the whole residential area whith buildings etc.
or garden by garden.
More information about the Tagging