[Tagging] Re : Re : Re : Ski resort (once again)
yvecai at gmail.com
Tue Feb 5 06:06:25 GMT 2013
Remains one question, site=piste or site=ski ?
The former is consistent with pistemap tagging, the other easiest to find in the wiki.
The rationale about route=piste covering also snowshoeing doesn't really apply here. Is there sites dedicated to this practice only ?
----- Reply message -----
De : "Martin Koppenhoefer" <dieterdreist at gmail.com>
Pour : "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools" <tagging at openstreetmap.org>
Cc : "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools" <tagging at openstreetmap.org>
Objet : [Tagging] Re : Re : Ski resort (once again)
Date : lun., févr. 4, 2013 23:25
Am 04/feb/2013 um 22:54 schrieb "yvecai at gmail.com" <yvecai at gmail.com>:
> For nordic and downhill, two sites or a semicolon ? That is the question.
IMHO put the piste:type on the route relations and put those route relations into a site relation (or group with tags) but don't repeat the piste:type on the grouped object
Tagging mailing list
Tagging at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging